“The important claim here is not the stated argument that terrorist lawyers should be publicly revealed, or that they shouldn’t be working for the DOJ. It’s the assumption that they are representing terrorists. The assumption permeates conservative rhetoric on issues of torture and detainee rights. … Thiessen makes explicit the position that the rhetoric about ‘terrorist lawyers’ is meant to imply — namely, that terrorists should not have lawyers at all. The conclusion flows naturally when you begin by defining the defendants as ‘terrorists.’ The truth, though, is that a good number of these ‘terrorists’ are not terrorists at all.” (03/18/10)