|
Posted on 02.27.08 by Thomas L. Knapp
“The German government’s purchase of data stolen from a Liechtenstein bank has reinvigorated longstanding debates about privacy, law enforcement and international relations. Much of the fallout has followed predictable patterns. Some argue that Germany’s richest citizens should be brought to justice for failing to comply with the tax laws, while others point out that it is unseemly for a nation to spy on a peaceful neighbor. The conflict between Germany and Liechtenstein also has triggered a broader debate about tax competition and the role of so-called tax havens. The Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is trying to use the imbroglio to resuscitate its initiative against tax competition. Willem Buiter, a professor at the London School of Economics, is using the issue to push an even more radical agenda: the forcible annexation — by nations like Austria and France, under some unknown authority — of jurisdictions such as Liechtenstein, Andorra and Monaco. At best, these crusades against tax havens are misguided. At worst, they are an effort to create a tax cartel for the benefit of high-tax nations.” (02/26/08) Link: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9241 Filed under: RRND Commentary | Report Bad Link Bookmark this post in Furl or Del.icio.us | |









