Last week’s topic — essentially the question of whether or not a libertarian political party, practicing electoral politics, can effectively advance liberty — generated answers leaning toward “no.” That leads into this week’s question:

If not electoral politics, then what?

Can libertarianism advance itself as some kind of non-electoral movement? A protest or activism vehicle, perhaps? A counter-economic revolution taking place outside of normal “political” channels? Or was Nock right in asserting that we’re doomed to “remnant” status — keeping the idea of liberty alive in an environment which does not allow for its actual implementation, and awaiting better circumstances? Or something I haven’t mentioned?

I’m all ears.